zlacker

People can believe whatever they like. It doesn't make them right.

The flaw is in your quote: there is no "super-intelligent AI". We don't have AGI, and given they were coming out with this a few years ago (GPT2?) it's laughable.

They're getting way ahead of themselves.

>>nprate+(OP)
"We don't have AGI"

We don't have 2 degrees Celsius warming either. Should we do nothing to change course or prepare? Any thinker worth their salt knows you need to plan ahead not react to things as they come and leave to chance that you then may not be able to.

>>reduce+r3
Exactly. Which is why this shows they don't genuinely believe their own hype and fear-mongering. This says more than anything that people at the cutting edge don't really think AGI is on the horizon.

>>nprate+V8
They're heavily incentivized not to! Exxon executives in the 80s disbelieved in climate change, too, despite reports from their internal "safety" teams that it was going to be a big problem.

>>SpicyL+Ba
The company that develops real AGI will become a trillion dollar company over night (and destroy all the competition). They are massively live-or-die incentivised.