zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. root_a+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-15 17:54:41
No. Surreptitious means done with deliberate stealth to conceal your actions, not a miscalculation that results in a failure.
replies(1): >>ben_w+f3
2. ben_w+f3[view] [source] 2024-05-15 18:12:17
>>root_a+(OP)
To those who are dead, that's a distinction without a difference. So far as I'm aware, none of the "killer robots gone wrong" actual sci-fi starts with someone deliberately aiming to wipe themselves out, it's always a misspecification or an unintended consequence.

The fact that we don't know how to determine if there's a misspecification or an unintended consequence is the alignment problem.

replies(2): >>root_a+dl >>8note+es
◧◩
3. root_a+dl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 19:49:38
>>ben_w+f3
"Unintended consequences" has nothing to do with AI specifically, it's a problem endemic to every human system. The "alignment" problem has no meaning in today's AI landscape beyond whether or not your LLM will emit slurs.
◧◩
4. 8note+es[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 20:26:08
>>ben_w+f3
To those who are dead, it doesn't matter if there was a human behind the wheel, or a matrix
[go to top]