zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Jensso+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-15 17:19:24
The first AGI will probably take way too much compute to have a significant effect, unless there is a revolution in architecture that gets us fast and cheap AGI at once the AGI revolution will be very slow and gradual.

A model that is as good as an average human but costs $10 000 per effective manhour to run is not very useful, but it is still an AGI.

replies(1): >>jagrsw+Vd
2. jagrsw+Vd[view] [source] 2024-05-15 18:31:25
>>Jensso+(OP)
> A model that is as good as an average human but costs $10 000 per effective manhour to run is not very useful, but it is still an AGI.

Geohot (https://geohot.github.io/blog/) estimates that a human brain equivalent requires 20 PFLOPS. Current top-of-the-line GPUs are around 2 PFLOPS and consume up to 500W. Scaling that linearly results in 5kW, which translates to approximately 3 EUR per hour if I calculate correctly.

replies(1): >>Jensso+7n
◧◩
3. Jensso+7n[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 19:21:21
>>jagrsw+Vd
That is if the first model we make is as efficient as a human.
[go to top]