zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. threes+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-05-14 23:45:50
Most of the VCs have already spent their money in the last couple of years.

So he may have a blank check but not nearly enough to build an OpenAI competitor.

Would love to see him at IBM with full use of their quantum systems.

replies(2): >>throwu+G >>mbesto+a1
2. throwu+G[view] [source] 2024-05-14 23:54:04
>>threes+(OP)
> Would love to see him at IBM with full use of their quantum systems.

I’m picturing a Wild Wild West-style mad scientist, creating a steampunk army from old spare parts from Big Blue and rising up to challenge the cyber people.

3. mbesto+a1[view] [source] 2024-05-14 23:59:25
>>threes+(OP)
> Most of the VCs have already spent their money in the last couple of years.

Lol no. There is about ~$500B in VC dollars, not to mention $1.2T in buyout dry powder still floating around. Not to mention venture funds raised continue to grow YoY.

https://www.bain.com/globalassets/noindex/2024/bain_report_g...

replies(1): >>threes+I3
◧◩
4. threes+I3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 00:22:37
>>mbesto+a1
I was referring more specifically to the AI segment.

Many of the VCS are over-exposed and still need to have funds to cover follow-on investments in the space. Not buying that there is the widespread appetite to fund a multi-billion new startup like there was a year or two ago.

replies(1): >>thomas+79
◧◩◪
5. thomas+79[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-05-15 01:11:43
>>threes+I3
Some sources are needed to back those claims up. Which VCs are you talking about?
[go to top]