zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. cycoma+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:18:11
The software licencing is also completely irrelevant here, nobody said that Anduril can't use Nix. The issue was that the community largely did not want them as sponsors. There is a very big difference to allowing someone (or some company) to use your software and wanting to participate in a conference where the same company is a sponsor.
replies(1): >>rgrmrt+r2
2. rgrmrt+r2[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:27:20
>>cycoma+(OP)
I honestly don't understand what objecting to them as a sponsor does. Sponsorship benefits the project for everyone. Is the objection to both the sponsorship and their presence in the conference? Folks who don't want to engage with them at the conference can simply not engage with them.

Also AFAIK one of the conferences objected to their presence, so they weren't able to have a booth there. Individual participants are in their right to make these decisions and act on them (like that one conference did). What exactly is the outcome people want?

replies(1): >>Pareto+hf
◧◩
3. Pareto+hf[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-04-29 17:23:50
>>rgrmrt+r2
People don't want Anduril to benefit from the NixOS they work on via publicity or association.

Most wouldn't have a problem with Anduril donating and asking for no sponsorship or other benefits in return.

[go to top]