zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tripdo+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:16:50
I think Nix is much simpler and more suited for software packaging than Scheme.
replies(1): >>orthec+Bp
◧
2. orthec+Bp[view] [source] 2024-04-29 18:11:14
>>tripdo+(OP)
I don't think any general purpose language ever invented is simpler than lisp/scheme. I've not taken the time to familiarize myself with Nix yet, and one of the reasons is that the syntax of learning yet another language with its own idioms and syntax isn't something I care to tackle right now. I would love to reap the benefits of something like Nix, but something like Guix is much more appealing to me.
replies(2): >>slekke+7w >>Twenty+F01
◧◩
3. slekke+7w[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-04-29 18:46:10
>>orthec+Bp
A shame Guix does not work on Mac and probably never will
◧◩
4. Twenty+F01[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-04-29 21:12:14
>>orthec+Bp
The Nix language is laughably simple, though, and (unlike Scheme) it happens to be typed.

It's literally just typed JSON with functions and a few built-ins. It's laughably simple and great. The whole "yet another programming language" refrain is so silly when it comes to Nix.

[go to top]