zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Pareto+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:04:43
Bridging Stallman's article to the issue at hand of sponsorship, I find it hard to believe that because he's fine with say Oracle using his code that he would also be fine with giving them a platform as a sponsor.

I don't actually know his position on this, but mean to communicate I see the use of free software and the sponsorship issue as separate issues.

replies(2): >>powera+p >>freedo+V
2. powera+p[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:06:36
>>Pareto+(OP)
You've already commented ten times in this thread. If you don't know, maybe don't say anything?
replies(1): >>Pareto+Qd
3. freedo+V[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:08:40
>>Pareto+(OP)
If Oracle wanted to give a bunch of money to the FSF and sponsor them? I would think RMS would be overjoyed by that development. The beauty of *GPL is that it can't be used exclusively to the benefit of one party (Oracle). It respects the freedom of the user. That's the whole point.
◧◩
4. Pareto+Qd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-04-29 16:59:13
>>powera+p
Do you know if Stallman would platform Oracle by allowing them to be a sponsor?
[go to top]