zlacker

The letter is authored by "anonymous contributors", actually. This suggests the authors are minor contributors at the periphery of the project.

>>gizmo+(OP)
It does not. And not only is this particular letter signed by many active contributors, the issues far predate this one letter (with this one demand), and many well-known contributors have been involved in speaking out against the current situation.

You're not going to understand complex governance issues and their history from a read of a single article or letter. Consequently, you probably should refrain from drawing conclusions that way.

>>joepie+62
The letter is an unhinged diatribe written by anonymous authors and should be disregarded on that basis.