zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ohwell+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:58:48
This is a great point, and perhaps we do need a new popular license or set of variants that exclude certain industries. "MIT-Peaceful" perhaps.

I know very many people who would refuse to work for certain companies and in certain industries — and have rejected certain projects — but would happily contribute to something MIT licensed that would end up in those systems anyway!

replies(2): >>rgrmrt+d1 >>somepl+6N1
2. rgrmrt+d1[view] [source] 2024-04-29 16:02:43
>>ohwell+(OP)
There are two licenses that include restrictions like that that I know of:

- https://github.com/raisely/NoHarm/blob/publish/LICENSE.md

- https://firstdonoharm.dev/

3. somepl+6N1[view] [source] 2024-04-30 03:18:21
>>ohwell+(OP)
> perhaps we do need a new popular license or set of variants that exclude certain industries.

Such a license would not be considered open source or Free Software.

Someone else posted this link about a similar situation in the past: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Crockford#Software_lic...

[go to top]