zlacker

> NO one wants to admit that the tyranny of leadership is probably a good thing for a projects success.

I don't disagree, but it needs to be communicated upfront and transparent without some guise of it being anything else so that potential contributors can decide if it's right for them from the outset.

>>Pareto+(OP)
The very people decrying the lack of leadership transparency on the moderation team do their work behind closed doors, don't operate with transparency or consistency and disallow all meta discussion of their moderation work.

Oh and ban anyone that openly disagrees with their values.

>>buster+F
> The very people decrying the lack of leadership transparency on the moderation team do their work behind closed doors, don't operate with transparency or consistency and disallow all meta discussion of their moderation work.

This just isn't true. See "Transparency about jonringers suspension"[0] and also notice it's a suspension and not a ban. Note that Jon's post to reddit titled it a "ban".

Which side seems to be trying to stir things up here?

Also, before that discourse post there has always been a public moderation log here:

https://github.com/NixOS/moderation/commit/c0f7744701cba40f0...

0: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/why-was-jon-ringer-banned-from...