zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. croes+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-03-01 19:50:37
Same with Musk,'s warning about the dangers of AI but then he released one too.
replies(3): >>gridsp+Dj >>dylan6+8p >>arando+Wp
◧
2. gridsp+Dj[view] [source] 2024-03-01 21:53:35
>>croes+(OP)
The only real defense against dangerous AI is friendly AI.
replies(1): >>therou+sn
◧◩
3. therou+sn[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-01 22:19:57
>>gridsp+Dj
If anyone is going to make AI that wants to destroy humans, its elon musk.
◧
4. dylan6+8p[view] [source] 2024-03-01 22:30:34
>>croes+(OP)
This is my main question, how open is Tesla's FSD "AI"? Why is it okay for his AI to be closed with a direct path of killing/harming people?
replies(2): >>BytesA+mp1 >>jfray2+1c3
◧
5. arando+Wp[view] [source] 2024-03-01 22:36:23
>>croes+(OP)
if you can't fight them, join them
◧◩
6. BytesA+mp1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-02 10:02:18
>>dylan6+8p
I think legally, because he didn’t take a bunch of money and promise the donors to make it open
replies(1): >>dylan6+Dx2
◧◩◪
7. dylan6+Dx2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-02 21:09:37
>>BytesA+mp1
Google started as “Don’t be evil”, but later changed. Did the early investors sue for that change in core belief? What about the bald face lie of FB’s “free and always will be” when they are robbing your privacy blind?
◧◩
8. jfray2+1c3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-03 03:56:13
>>dylan6+8p
Parent might have been talking about Twitter's Grok AI?
[go to top]