zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. burnte+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2024-03-01 17:48:53
No, he wasn't forced to buy Twitter, but he didn't want to pay the $1bn deal failure fee, so instead he spent $44bn to buy Twitter and drive it directly into the ground. But he COULD have just paid $1bn and walked away.
replies(1):
>>theGnu+CK
◧
2. theGnu+CK
[view]
[source]
2024-03-01 22:04:10
>>burnte+(OP)
Nah he wanted the narrative power. Twitter is, he argues, the newspaper of record of the internet and he is its editor.
replies(1):
>>burnte+q83
◧◩
3. burnte+q83
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2024-03-02 22:50:39
>>theGnu+CK
He says that now, but he tried to back out of the deal, so we know he at one point realized the buy wasn't a good move.
[go to top]