zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. viscan+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-03-01 17:47:23
They didn't actually fire the board of the non-profit. They just said they'd all quit in protest because of an action of the board they all felt was egregious. The board could have stayed and been a non-profit that did nothing ever again. They decided it was better to step down.
replies(1): >>cma+H6
2. cma+H6[view] [source] 2024-03-01 18:18:24
>>viscan+(OP)
I believe they have said they decided it was better to step down because of being threatened with suits.
replies(1): >>Aloisi+Nl
◧◩
3. Aloisi+Nl[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-01 19:28:55
>>cma+H6
I believe it was Helen Toner who claimed an OpenAI lawyer said they were at risk of breaching fiduciary duty if the company fell apart because of the ouster.
[go to top]