zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. whimsi+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-03-01 17:05:39
the statements made by the board were likely sufficient to trigger invesigation and the current iteration of the government (2010+) wants to have dirt on anything this big
replies(1): >>screen+d5
2. screen+d5[view] [source] 2024-03-01 17:28:06
>>whimsi+(OP)
Still not as big as Halliburton, I feel it’s the opposite the government isn’t detaining these obvious frauders and now they run amock.
replies(1): >>wkat42+e8
◧◩
3. wkat42+e8[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-01 17:42:21
>>screen+d5
Halliburton was protected by the government because their top dogs were literally running the country. It's a very different scenario from OpenAI.
replies(1): >>bloope+ke
◧◩◪
4. bloope+ke[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-03-01 18:09:07
>>wkat42+e8
> Halliburton was protected by the government because their top dogs were literally running the country.

Let's not give Sam Altman any ideas!

[go to top]