zlacker

The essential theory of the case is that OpenAI is misusing the funds Musk donated to it.

reads prayer for relief

> For a judicial determination that GPT-4 constitutes Artificial General Intelligence

Okay, WTF? I'm going to have to read the entire complaint now.....

>>jcranm+(OP)
I assume this is because OpenAI committed to do certain things if and when they build AGI.

>>jcranm+(OP)
Man is that a big juicy meatball if you're a judge, though. Who would not love to hear that case.

>>jcranm+(OP)
I think OpenAI has been using the excuse that GPT-4 is not AGI, and therefore can remain closed-source.

>>jcranm+(OP)
AGI as defined narrowly by OpenAI, Microsoft et al for their contracts, not what scientists would define it as .

While I don’t think we are close to AGI, we also have to acknowledge that term is forever changing meaning and goal posts , even 10 years back a Turing test would be considered sufficient, obviously not anymore .

The scientific, public understanding is changing constantly and a court would have difficulty in making a decision if there is no consensus , it only has to see if the contractual definition has been met