zlacker

> I'm really rooting for AMD to break the CUDA monopoly

Personally I want Nvidia to break the x86-64 monopoly, with how amazing properly spec'd Nvidia cards are to work with I can only dream of a world where Nvidia is my CPU too.

>>whywhy+(OP)
apt username

>>whywhy+(OP)
That’s already been done with ARM.

>>whywhy+(OP)
> Personally I want Nvidia to break the x86-64 monopoly

The one supplied by two companies?

>>weebul+6N
Maybe he meant homogeneity which Nvidia did try and tries with Arm.. but, on the other hand how wild would it be for Nvidia to enter x86-64 as well? It's probably never going to happen due to licensing if nothing else, lest we remember nForce chipset ordeal with intel legal.

>>whywhy+(OP)
How would this a good idea? I am not very familiar with GPU programming but the small amount I've tried was nothing but pain a few years ago on linux, it was so bad that Torvald publicly used the f word in a very public event. That aside, CUDA seem like a great way to lock people in even further like AWS does with absolutely everything

>>weebul+6N
"minor spelling/terminology mistake, activate the post-o-tron"

>>Keyfra+NY
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Denver#History

>>mickae+r81
>I am not very familiar with GPU programming but the small amount I've tried was nothing but pain a few years ago on linux, it was so bad that Torvald publicly used the f word in a very public event.

I'm pretty sure Torvalds was giving the finger over the subject of GPU drivers (which run on the CPU), not programming on the Nvidia GPU itself. Particularly, they namedropped Bumblebee (and maybe Optimus?) which was more about power-management and making Nvidia cooperate with a non-Nvidia integrated GPU than it was about the Nvidia GPU itself.

>>mickae+r81
>CUDA seem like a great way to lock people in even further like AWS does with absolutely everything

Lock people in to something that didn’t exist in a way any user could use before it existed? I get people hate CUDAs dominance but no one else was pushing this before CUDA and Apple+AMD completely fumbled OpenCL.

Can’t hate on something good just because it’s successful and I can’t be angry the talent behind the success wanting to profit.

>>Keyfra+NY
Indeed, but I think people forget that the reason AMD have a license in the first place was because Intel's customers in the early days required a second source for it's processors.

Who owns the Cyrix x86 license these days?