zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-02 23:33:42
I just posted about that here: >>39235382 . The relevant part is in the middle of that rather, er, wallish text, but if you read it (assuming you find it!) and have a question I didn't answer, I'd be happy to take a crack at it.
replies(1): >>nathan+Ci
2. nathan+Ci[view] [source] 2024-02-03 02:42:21
>>dang+(OP)
Just wanted to say thanks for the clarity of how this is handled and what to do if a submitter disagrees. Really appreciate all the work you do.
[go to top]