zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. threat+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-02 16:57:01
It's dubious that HN mods think that way of Altman though.
replies(2): >>nottor+D >>dang+0F1
2. nottor+D[view] [source] 2024-02-02 16:59:22
>>threat+(OP)
s/mods/users? everyone can flag stories.
replies(1): >>wolver+L3
◧◩
3. wolver+L3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 17:14:36
>>nottor+D
It's not flags (or not sufficient to remove the story):

>>39231055

replies(1): >>lolind+07
◧◩◪
4. lolind+07[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 17:31:11
>>wolver+L3
Flags are sufficient. I just posted a comment on the comment you linked to: I have many times been the person who pressed "flag" on a story and then watched it immediately disappear.

I think there's some threshold of flags to upvotes and possibly some other metrics that determines whether a story vanishes, but flags can absolutely tip the scales.

5. dang+0F1[view] [source] 2024-02-03 03:57:43
>>threat+(OP)
I like Sam, but "$celebrity says $thing about $common-topic" is almost never a good basis for a frontpage thread on HN.

It's vital to HN that user flags and/or software like the flamewar detector clear most such submissions off the front page. They tend to attract a lot of upvotes because that's what sensational (and especially indignant-sensational) stories do. Without countervailing mechanisms, HN would be completely taken over by those stories.

[go to top]