zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. beejiu+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-02 10:02:07
I thought that Starlink always "landed" to a base station back in the same jurisdiction? I think relaying through space could open a regulatory can of worms.
replies(1): >>psd1+63
2. psd1+63[view] [source] 2024-02-02 10:36:34
>>beejiu+(OP)
What kind of worms?
replies(2): >>action+E5 >>beejiu+Vt
◧◩
3. action+E5[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 11:05:30
>>psd1+63
Bypassing spying, geofencing and other regulatory stuff, perhaps? Also curious what the can of worms might be.
◧◩
4. beejiu+Vt[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 14:28:34
>>psd1+63
All countries have strict regulations on radio waves, whether that's sending or receiving. The UK for example requires a license for base stations that stipulates things like geographical boundaries, etc.

You can't freely blast radio waves into a country without falling subject to its varying regulations, but the regulations for "pre Starlink" satellite broadband/phones/etc are fairly well established.

replies(2): >>luciop+DL >>solard+NY1
◧◩◪
5. luciop+DL[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 15:50:35
>>beejiu+Vt
Well maybe it makes sense for US costumer to send their traffic down from Starlink in Canada and then via fiber to the USA? I do not really see the problem if the traffic is encrypted and forwarded.
◧◩◪
6. solard+NY1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 21:23:14
>>beejiu+Vt
Does this count for radio waves beamed in from space (like GPS)?
[go to top]