zlacker

Don't need an LLM for that (except maybe to get funding), a plain old classifier would work fine at a fraction of the training & inference costs.

>>nostra+(OP)
Yeah, but why would you make that effort when all you'd need is the thinnest veneer over ChatGPT, and given the proposed pricing would leave plenty of margin?

>>nostra+(OP)
Well you're not going to be able to charge them a lot of money without claiming LLM and you won't get funding, so gotta think about the big picture.

>>bryanr+su
Don't worry, you can say something vague like "it's powered by LLM" which could reasonably mean that the LLM was used during the training phase of your own classifier.

>>dns_sn+pA
Or that you asked ChatGPT how to write scikit-learn code.