zlacker

Why would you charge a drunk CEO less?

>>throwu+(OP)
Right? That's where you make the revenue in your freemium pricing model.

>>throwu+(OP)
Nobody’s buying at $1000/month but “giving them half off” makes them think they’re getting a deal.

What they don’t know is they could just have a file on their computer named “is this offensive (open when drunk).txt” with contents that read “yes”.

>>lcnPyl+J2
Um… there are liters lawyers and PR professionals that make their living with that kind of service. And for a certain personality type… I don’t see the 1k$/month being the relevant factor. I’d bet there would be buyers for that service. Though: Probably not enough to actually sustain the liability insurance that you’d need to deal with the complaints of a faulty product

>>lcnPyl+J2
I have fond memories of Gmail's "no emailing drunk" feature and I swear it saved me a couple times.

I think it no longer works, or, well, I grew up.

>>hnacco+B6
It's OK. If the client tries to write a nasty tweet about you, or email a lawyer about you, it will "help" the client, by telling them this is offensive and blocking the action.

Doubly so if you try to uninstall it.

>>riffra+8b
Mail Goggles - apparently released in 2008[0]. I can't find it, so I don't think it exists anymore.

[0] https://gmail.googleblog.com/2008/10/new-in-labs-stop-sendin...

>>lcnPyl+J2
You sound extremely business savvy, looking for business partners?