zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. EasyMa+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-02 03:27:58
In a way, but now you can make sure your bot's racist post makes it to the top for $8 a month
replies(1): >>tourma+i1
2. tourma+i1[view] [source] 2024-02-02 03:40:16
>>EasyMa+(OP)
True; before that you simply had to be “notable”, whatever that meant.
replies(2): >>TeMPOr+Nd >>sehans+3y
◧◩
3. TeMPOr+Nd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 05:44:48
>>tourma+i1
Spending $10 one time with one of many companies that sold likes, follows, retweets, etc. for peanuts.
◧◩
4. sehans+3y[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 09:16:26
>>tourma+i1
No, before Elon the blue tick was just a blue tick next to your name. Now posts by blue ticks are also sorted before other posts in the interface.
replies(1): >>TeMPOr+lA
◧◩◪
5. TeMPOr+lA[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 09:45:00
>>sehans+3y
Before Elon, posts on Twitter were sorted and hidden at the whim of engagement-maximizing algorithm. After Elon, the same is the case, maybe with the same tweak to the algorithm.

I thought the idea that timeline sorting order on social media sites is deterministic or scrutable to the viewer is long dead by now - it's not been the case for at least a good decade now!

replies(1): >>rsynno+GJ
◧◩◪◨
6. rsynno+GJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 11:25:24
>>TeMPOr+lA
While that's true, the thing where ~all bluetick replies are promoted above ~all normal replies is a post-Musk 'innovation'. Stupid idea; there's 25 years of experience showing that pay-for-attention is corrosive to social sites (dating/hookup sites have been trying to make it work basically forever, and have generally ended up having to ration it).
replies(1): >>mlrtim+SY
◧◩◪◨⬒
7. mlrtim+SY[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 13:40:26
>>rsynno+GJ
The point remains that Pre and Post Musk Twitter are NO different when it comes to inflammatory tweets.

The players and ordering has changed only.

[go to top]