zlacker

A tweet is a thought with cheap delivery, therefore offers no insight at all. It's just like an anecdote from executive leadership to get something over the line to meet a goal. That person has absolutely forgot they said it the next day.

>>honeyb+(OP)
You can string tweets together or if you're a blue check you can just write a treatise, so you aren't really limited to 140/280 chars any longer.

>>honeyb+(OP)
Twitter is bad. Failing to grok that is also bad. What is your point?

>>steven+W5
This message confused me on a few dimensions, so I translated it a bit:

"State subjective perspective as objective fact. Cast shame upon the OP for not pre-aligning with said belief. Put the responsibility on the OP to prove that they are not deserving of shame."

I grew up in an environment where this kind communication was sort of the default, hence why I was curious and wanted to drill down a bit and give it some thought. Of course, many people agree that Twitter is more unhealthy than healthy. But that's not entirely the point here, I think.