zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Macha+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-02 02:25:50
The way HN is set up, having 500 comments would have contributed to that. The "flamewar detector" the mods sometimes mention seems to take comments/votes and comments/time into consideration then penalises threads.
replies(2): >>throwa+W1 >>Brajes+54
2. throwa+W1[view] [source] 2024-02-02 02:39:22
>>Macha+(OP)
Yep. The HN users see is highly curated. Mostly by algorithms, sometimes by humans.
replies(1): >>dang+R6
3. Brajes+54[view] [source] 2024-02-02 02:57:33
>>Macha+(OP)
Yes, this is correct from my observation, too. The comment-to-vote ratios go fast; up south, they will likely be out of the pages quickly. One might think that a post that falls off the homepage would linger on page 2 for a while, but it can be out of even the first 100 posts fast.

I have stopped thinking about HN's algorithms and just let it do its job.

◧◩
4. dang+R6[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-02 03:23:30
>>throwa+W1
You're right. Here's 10 years' worth of me explaining that:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

[go to top]