zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. dang+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2024-02-01 22:14:11
Please see
>>39222188
.
We detached this comment from
>>39217390
.
replies(1):
>>el-dud+gf
◧
2. el-dud+gf
[view]
[source]
2024-02-01 23:45:52
>>dang+(OP)
Not a complaint, genuinely asking, therefore does not break the rules.
[go to top]