zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. coryrc+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-28 09:16:39
The amount of vitamins in food is trending down. We say we're farming, but the plants are living on materials delivered from petroleum or natural gas in a media where we attempt to kill all life. There's not a cycle. We shouldn't complete that cycle because our waste streams are doomed with toxic chemicals (f.ex. PFAS).

In the US we build shelters either out of carbon-intensive materials or use significant carbon fuels for upkeep... or both, usually.

It's not that the technology isn't there, we just choose not to. Hell, some 30% of people love that reality star turned president. Sadly we're getting what we deserve.

replies(1): >>green7+Uf
2. green7+Uf[view] [source] 2024-01-28 11:57:49
>>coryrc+(OP)
There are great opportunities here — improving farming being a great one as you mention.

Changing our farming methods to increase humus and topsoil quality should bring back vitamins to our food. Not only this but it should also capture a great amount of CO₂. I'm not sure how reliable my memory or the original calculation are but I remember reading in "The Scientist as Rebel" that if we increase our topsoil by 2 inches on currently farmed land, that should capture most of the carbon we've emitted during industrialisation.

Of course, as you mention, if we keep mindlessly following the status quo, we'll keep getting what we deserve.

[go to top]