It's all marketing garbage, because their profits were impacted. Nothing more.
edit: typo..doh
I take it even further than that. I also try to avoid going anywhere near houses that have them.
turns out people do want a surveillance state, they were just uncomfortable putting cameras on the roofs
In any case, these things tend to be used by a fairly specific demographic that tends to congregate in specific neighborhoods, so I can use that as a proxy and avoid going to those neighborhoods.
Care to elaborate? I actually have no clue what you are talking about, so I'm curious.
This article points to concrete actions that Amazon is taking. It explicitly states end result. We can all agree that needing to get a warrant first makes things harder, yes?
Are you implying that they are lying about this? Or are you implying that it’s meaningless because it’s not being done for what you see as commendable reasons?
Please don’t use my questions as an opportunity to get on your soapbox. I am really just trying to understand if this is anything more than “Amazon bad”.
But now that it is set up there are no subscription fees, the data is local, and I can manage the cameras and their Unifi accounts remotely if they need anything. It’s been a great experience and I’m planning to gradually add one or two additional cameras.
But it sounds like they're freely admitting that they're going to continue giving footage without a warrant. So I wouldn't call it a lie, more a marketing strategy. "Oh we pinky promise we won't give away your footage without a warrant! ... Well, except maybe that one time. But that was a special case, surely you understand."
1. They cannot be trusted, so personally, I think their words are just words. You are welcome to trust them and not if, but when that goes esplodie, you'll know why I don't trust them.
2. It's a minor change to a continued violation of people's privacy, so essentially it's a meaningless change that sounds like change, but isn't really a change at all.
I don't think that follows. How is wanting a bit of personal security the same as wanting a "surveilance state"?
https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/15/24002920/ubiquiti-fixed-...
Unfortunately there’s rarely a perfect solution. Purely local is great and comes with its own tradeoffs.
that is a fundamental part of owning a ring camera - if you just cared about personal security you would buy a gun instead or live in a gated community. a camera isn't gonna do anything for you.