zlacker

>>rntn+(OP)
Ring forever became the 3rd party police with these things. I'll never own one, no matter what lies they trot out.

It's all marketing garbage, because their profits were impacted. Nothing more.

edit: typo..doh

>>sonica+Po
> I've never own one

I take it even further than that. I also try to avoid going anywhere near houses that have them.

>>JohnFe+Wq
Isn't it kind of hard to tell if a house has one without actually going near it in the first place?

>>Paul-C+Dv
if you are in a neighborhood where everyone makes above a certain level of money literally every door has one. this is true across countries even(the cameras might not be called ring tho)

turns out people do want a surveillance state, they were just uncomfortable putting cameras on the roofs

>>kkarak+ux
"turns out people do want a surveillance state"

I don't think that follows. How is wanting a bit of personal security the same as wanting a "surveilance state"?

>>r0sale+QB4
because it doesn't stop at personal security - they participate in the forums set up by ring and share videos of "problematic activity".

that is a fundamental part of owning a ring camera - if you just cared about personal security you would buy a gun instead or live in a gated community. a camera isn't gonna do anything for you.