zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. lifthr+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-24 02:53:29
You don't necessarily need `-ffast-math` if you are willing to tweak your code a bit, since you can just introduce accumulators by yourself. Such optimizer-friendly code is not hard to write if you know basic principles.
replies(1): >>mratsi+Pm
2. mratsi+Pm[view] [source] 2024-01-24 07:02:26
>>lifthr+(OP)
That's what I'm saying though. Either youbdo the accumulators yourself, or you need a compiler escape hatch.
replies(1): >>lifthr+1q
◧◩
3. lifthr+1q[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-24 07:39:04
>>mratsi+Pm
I mean, you don't need SIMD to put accumulators.
replies(1): >>mratsi+CG3
◧◩◪
4. mratsi+CG3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-25 07:45:44
>>lifthr+1q
The compiler escape hatch is -ffast-math
[go to top]