zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. jpcfl+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-23 14:22:33
I would surmise that a great deal of this is biological, but a radical gender theorist would likely rebut that these differences are due to social conditioning. He would say that men/males are conditioned to take more risk, conditioned to desire working with _things_, and conditioned to desire prestige in their jobs.

How would one go about designing a study that eliminates the variable of social conditioning when trying to study sociological differences between the sexes, or is that even important to indicate these sentiments are/aren't linked to biology?

replies(1): >>gagany+D4
2. gagany+D4[view] [source] 2024-01-23 14:41:19
>>jpcfl+(OP)
Here's one study that tried to eliminate that variable, by using rhesus monkeys:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/

replies(1): >>jpcfl+Z9
◧◩
3. jpcfl+Z9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-23 15:04:50
>>gagany+D4
Thank you! I have to say, I find the gender-neutral toy layout here in CA stores very annoying when I go shopping for children's toys. It's bizarre to me that the state has mandated it, and I was really disappointed when Newsom glossed over this question in his interview with Maher last week.
[go to top]