zlacker

Sex differences in work preferences among gifted men and women

submitted by lopken+(OP) on 2024-01-23 13:58:18 | 29 points 27 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
2. andsoi+l2[view] [source] 2024-01-23 14:11:12
>>lopken+(OP)
Here is the original source: https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/sex-differences-in-wo...
4. tokai+R2[view] [source] 2024-01-23 14:14:11
>>lopken+(OP)
I thought Paul didn't respect behavioral psychology.[0] Guess it depends on the bias its pushing.

[0]https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1476550040135024648?lang=da

7. rnadom+B3[view] [source] 2024-01-23 14:17:25
>>lopken+(OP)
Does anyone have the study where this originated?

This chart is quite difficult to read, and it's not clear how the data was collected or what amount of overlap exists between the people in each category. Also, what were the sample sizes? Are the men and women in approximately the same careers? These are preferences; were individuals asked to rank preferences or did they rate each preference independently? What does a standard deviation mean here (units)?

I take the display to mean that, for example, the sampled profoundly gifted women prefer to have satisfaction in their work much more than the sampled profoundly gifted men. Or does it mean that women rank satisfaction over other items more than men but they really do care equally about satisfaction in a nominal sense?

Can anyone else chime in on their interpretation?

--

EDIT: Link to study

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00169862231175831

◧◩
13. andsoi+M4[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-23 14:23:01
>>rnadom+B3
For interpretation: https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/sex-differences-in-wo...

(seems like paulg got the chart from this guy's tweet, which refers to the article I link above, which is informed by the study you linked to)

◧◩
16. gagany+d9[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-23 14:41:19
>>jpcfl+A4
Here's one study that tried to eliminate that variable, by using rhesus monkeys:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583786/

◧◩
18. coreth+dd[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-23 14:58:25
>>prepen+Z1
Relevant study:

Look up the gender equality paradox in Nordic countries. Nordic countries are the most egalitarian countries in the world that offer the best equal opportunities for men and women. The initial conclusions were that as Nordic countries made opportunities for either gender more equal the differences in choice for careers between genders became more pronounced.

There's various cooked interpretations of the result from agenda based groups but those are the initial results. This person illustrates the whole study the best:

https://youtu.be/_iudkPi4_sY?si=DPtr46-vw94sa70v

It's hard to draw a definitive conclusion from the study due to all the controversy and various parties cooking the numbers for their own agenda but take from it what you will, but the initial conclusion was that most of this is biological.

◧◩◪◨⬒
27. mitthr+RWy[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-02-03 05:03:32
>>asylte+X3
"In early 17th-century Europe, high heels were a sign of masculinity and high social status." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-heeled_shoe
[go to top]