zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. darcys+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-18 21:43:04
The issue is that without funding a projects velocity is low and that can frustrate the community.

Everyone says they are on board with supporting the little guys, until they hit bugs and start complaining.

replies(2): >>mikro2+d41 >>willi5+rD2
2. mikro2+d41[view] [source] 2024-01-19 06:47:35
>>darcys+(OP)
Sometimes -- those times when you're breaking entirely new ground with a thing, when you're starting with just a vague vision of where the thing might go -- slow is better. Slow gives you time to understand the effects of what you've already done and the possibilities that affords.

I guess it depends on whether you're looking to achieve something unique and truly new, or just "get rich fast".

3. willi5+rD2[view] [source] 2024-01-19 17:38:32
>>darcys+(OP)
if we lived in utopia the software could be open source, so that everyone who wants a feature can contribute. Best would be when it can easily be self hosted
[go to top]