zlacker

This is an argument for standards. You can switch messaging clients. Platforms own you.

>>laurex+(OP)
Yes, and ̶G̶m̶a̶i̶l̶ email is such a successful example.

>>KRAKRI+k3
It is. I switched away from Gmail; many have.

>>KRAKRI+k3
Imagine if the progenitors of email thought to require e-stamps, say a thousand emails for a buck. There's a parallel universe where 'Email co.' is a major tech player comparable to Google. Not sure it's a better universe, but bears consideration.

>>therei+d8
In the late 1980s, I worked for a company that wanted to do exactly that.

It was an X.400-based nightmare, and never took off.

>>therei+d8
I remember a joke (or conspiracy theory) from the 90’s that the US Postal Service wanted to charge people per email.

>>NoraCo+47
Same, but I realize that nearly everyone I correspond with uses Gmail, so Google has all my emails regardless. (Ok, they don't get my transactional email, since those are usually sent through something like Sendgrid, but... yeah.)

>>therei+d8
This effectively does exist https://www.jpay.com/PEmessages.aspx

>>kelnos+Fg
> Same, but I realize that nearly everyone I correspond with uses Gmail, so Google has all my emails regardless.

I know some very privacy-focused person (a friend of mine) who will stop being willing to be in contact with you (or being your friend) if you use an email address at one of these big spying email providers to write him an email.

So, it is just a matter of being consequential.

>>unholy+za
Maybe not USPS but it would be okay to pay for it somehow to make it harder for scammers, spammers and other harbingers of ruin.