zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. bayind+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-17 14:16:31
Oh, hey! Thanks for chiming in. It's rare to see rejection of grammar rules on longer forms of writing, so it looked interesting.

Any special reasons? Just because I like to know people through their choices and views. Didn't want to sound rude in the previous comment, so if I did, genuinely sorry (non-native speaker woes).

replies(1): >>jynels+z1
2. jynels+z1[view] [source] 2024-01-17 14:22:03
>>bayind+(OP)
two reasons:

1. writing in lowercase is freeing. it reminds me that grammatical rules are arbitrary, and by extension other rules. "you can just do things."

2. people who are pedantic about this when it's clearly intentional are probably not people i want to interact with anyway, so it's a good anti-asshole filter (https://siderea.dreamwidth.org/1209794.html)

replies(4): >>bayind+z3 >>prmph+i7 >>coldpi+oa >>WuxiFi+Sx2
◧◩
3. bayind+z3[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 14:30:07
>>jynels+z1
That's interesting take, thanks. I'd love to chat with you further on this issue, but this is neither the place, nor the time. Maybe I'll mail you about this in the soon-ish future if that's OK for you.

Cheers!

replies(1): >>jynels+1a
◧◩
4. prmph+i7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 14:45:09
>>jynels+z1
Then wouldn't dispensing with other rules of grammar be even more "freeing"? This is both a genuine and rhetorical question.

I guess it's like user interface design, where a cardinal rule is to be conservative, and not break user expectations unduly.

Of course UI patterns and language evolves, but the evolution of changes should probably be gradual, and done for a justifiable purpose. In this case, I'm not sure the stylistic choice actually adds anything to the clarity or beauty of the writing.

◧◩◪
5. jynels+1a[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 14:57:02
>>bayind+z3
sure, i'm happy to chat more :) my email is on my website
◧◩
6. coldpi+oa[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 14:58:54
>>jynels+z1
You're going to get some strong/rude reactions from "the other side," which is unfortunate. FWIW, as a reader I do find it genuinely more difficult to read. Capitalization serves a purpose for me, it's not arbitrary. It more clearly separates each sentence. I have to put in more work to read your thoughts without it. Anyway regardless, the rudeness sucks. Sorry on behalf of others who feel as I do.
replies(1): >>jynels+le
◧◩◪
7. jynels+le[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 15:16:15
>>coldpi+oa
this is very kindly written, thank you :)

frankly i don't want a larger audience, i didn't expect this to hit HN. i hadn't thought about it being harder to read for people in the project though, i'll do a poll on whether they find it distracting.

replies(1): >>AlexAn+3I
◧◩◪◨
8. AlexAn+3I[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-17 17:25:57
>>jynels+le
Perhaps you could have a little button to programmatically insert capital letters?
◧◩
9. WuxiFi+Sx2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-18 04:12:10
>>jynels+z1
>> so it's a good anti-asshole filter

Oh, that is really a screwed thought. You think all people that don't agree with your writing format are assholes?

[go to top]