zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. airjtl+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-09 16:26:36
You mean the born-rich thin-skinned man-child is not a "free speech absolutist" and is actually opposed to free speech? I am shocked.
replies(1): >>kibwen+83
2. kibwen+83[view] [source] 2024-01-09 16:38:41
>>airjtl+(OP)
Anyone who unironically calls themselves a "free speech absolutist" needs to go meditate under a waterfall for a few years on what the point of free speech is, and what the consequences and implications of that are.
replies(1): >>mindsl+J7
◧◩
3. mindsl+J7[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-09 16:56:57
>>kibwen+83
Care to elaborate your point? I wouldn't label myself a "free speech absolutist" (seems like blowhard posturing), but my belief in freedom of speech does have an absolutist framing (it's a natural right flowing from computational enfranchisement plus the existence of cryptography).
[go to top]