zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. shpong+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-08 23:13:21
Who knows! I'm sure it depends on how accurately you want to simulate a flatworm brain.

I think current AI research has shown that simply representing a brain as a neural network (e.g. fully connected, simple neurons) is not sufficient for AGI.

replies(1): >>mewpme+Lm
2. mewpme+Lm[view] [source] 2024-01-09 01:52:16
>>shpong+(OP)
How has it shown that exactly if we just year ago had such a huge advance in terms of intelligence?
replies(1): >>shpong+Oc2
◧◩
3. shpong+Oc2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-09 16:46:03
>>mewpme+Lm
Estimates of GPT-4 parameter counts are ~1.7 trillion, which is approximately 20-fold greater than the ~85 billion human neurons we have. To me this suggests that naively building a 1:1 (or even 20:1) representation of simple neurons is insufficient for AGI.
[go to top]