zlacker

No, matrix multiplication is the system humans use to make predictions about those things but it doesn’t describe their fundamental structure and there’s no reason to imply they do.

>>edgyqu+(OP)
> describe their fundamental structure

That is literally, literally, what it does.

One may argue that it does so wrongly, but that's a different claim entirely.

> there’s no reason to imply they do

The predictions matching reality to the best of our collective abilities to test them is such a reason.

The saying that "all models are wrong but some are useful" is a reason against that.