zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. JChara+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-04 02:02:57
Yeah I find it very obscene that they ask so so many obtrusive questions for "statistics"
replies(1): >>conduc+x1
2. conduc+x1[view] [source] 2024-01-04 02:20:07
>>JChara+(OP)
I believe it’s compulsory or at minimum a way to protect themselves. I always choose the “rather not answer” option to every question that specifies it. The hiring managers rarely get to see the answers.

Oddly enough, I’m a white male and the most protected class “abuses” I’ve ever witnessed is when I’ve been told I wasn’t allowed to hire white males. I’ve actually been told I could not hire any one except a women before. My team was shorthanded for a year. I work in a niche that is probably 90%+ male and probably 70% white.

What’s also weird is, I usually hire through recruiters so when I tell them “only send me female resumes” the search just goes radio silent and I don’t even see what kind of talent I’m missing out on.

replies(1): >>throwa+bK1
◧◩
3. throwa+bK1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-04 16:29:10
>>conduc+x1
My response will be controversial: I am unsympathetic. Find the 9%+ of women. If they don't exist, they hire brilliant new grads and train them.
[go to top]