zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Negati+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-01-04 01:10:23
I think it really depends. Someone who had an a assault conviction at say 18 and is now 40, is a different situation from someone who very recently assaulted someone (but also how could you expect someone to change if they're never given a chance).

There's also the negative case of someone who has assaulted someone but was never caught, you can't safely eliminate that because there's no record of it.

replies(1): >>SoftTa+y1
2. SoftTa+y1[view] [source] 2024-01-04 01:26:40
>>Negati+(OP)
Assault is also not always what you might imagine. It doesn't require physical harm or even contact. Just putting someone in fear of harm can be assault. E.g. a disagreement getting heated and someone saying "I'm going to kick your ass" is technically assault. As is brandishing a weapon or making other threatening gestures even without physical contact or harm.
replies(1): >>grinfi+Pu
◧◩
3. grinfi+Pu[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-01-04 06:39:44
>>SoftTa+y1
Technically, sure. But you're not going to sit in prison for years such "technical" cases. So, somebody who did sit must supposedly have done more than that.

Second, I rather not have colleagues who are making threatening gestures or threaten to kick someones ass. I'm slightly appalled by the normalization of this kind of behavior.

[go to top]