zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. sylwar+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-30 21:47:00
This is Big Tech only: only them will have the amount of resources to fit the requirement of such act.

The only way for small actors is to move to... super small and simple tech... and they better be sure small tech<->big tech interop is hardcore regulated too or they will be zapped.

Yep, forget about those grotesquely and absurdely massive and complex web engines...

And now I am thinking about the hardware... they better come extra clean.

replies(1): >>Murome+Va
2. Murome+Va[view] [source] 2023-12-30 23:08:06
>>sylwar+(OP)
> This is Big Tech only: only them will have the amount of resources to fit the requirement of such act.

I haven't read the actual legalize in the final version. Which kind of responsibility is putting unbearable burden on the average web developer who slaps together few input fields and makes a nice CSS job?

Add: Auditing all the million dependencies in node_modules comes to mind, but maybe it's a good incentive to not.

replies(1): >>sylwar+ap
◧◩
3. sylwar+ap[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-31 01:59:18
>>Murome+Va
For "juicy" web sites, 10% is coding (and better _really_ think about FPGA/assembly), 90% actively protecting it... "web developer" is only a sub-skill of the actual "job".

Not to mention, in this very case the "whole perimeter" does include the client program (the OS is tied to the hardware), aka a Big Tech web browser. And since this is not small tech (which would be noscript/basic (x)html), this will de facto exclude anything which is not Big Tech for most "legal" projects which wants some ultra heavy and fancy "web". Because near 100% of the project managers out there won't even take the risk anymore with such act.

Yep, those who are not Big Tech better be ready to REALLY, and I mean REALLY get close to metal and use REALLY small and lean tech, and namely to do NOT use Big Tech open source web software (blink|geeko/webkit+SDK).

This is weird because that will kill economically any attempts at Big Tech alternatives, ALL OF THEM.

Big Tech is BILLIONS OF $ OF CASH WITH THE BACKUP FROM INVESTMENT FUNDS WORTH TENS OF THOUSANDS OF BILLIONS OF $: THERE IS NO FG&* ECONOMIC COMPETITION OR ANYTHING, WORLDWIDE AND THEY GET EU WIDE LAWS ONLY FOR THEM???

The first thing is to get ultra hardcore regulation on small tech<->big tech interop, and I really mean _small_ and _lean_ tech (the second you have Big Tech web engine or a massive SDK with an ultra complex language, you are done for).

Not to mention, EVERYBODY KNOWS COMPUTER SECURITY IS A FANTASY: IT DOES NOT EXIST, IT IS ONLY A PROCESS, NOT A DELIVERABLE WARANTY. And as far as I know, metrics to know if the "process" was good enough do not exists, and in such complex system it is just BS.

[go to top]