zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. pylua+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-29 18:55:39
There is nothing preventing scammers from modifying the software once they receive it then saying it is faulty. Especially with web technologies but even with desktop applications too.
replies(1): >>cuu508+n7
2. cuu508+n7[view] [source] 2023-12-29 19:37:40
>>pylua+(OP)
Ask scammers to demonstrate the fault using an unmodified copy downloaded from your downloads page. If the can not, no case.
replies(1): >>pylua+G7
◧◩
3. pylua+G7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-29 19:39:58
>>cuu508+n7
Some bugs are one in a million and may not be easily reproduced. How would you prove it’s not one of those?
replies(1): >>cuu508+1b
◧◩◪
4. cuu508+1b[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-29 19:57:14
>>pylua+G7
What specific scenario are you thinking of? Who is trying to prove what?
replies(1): >>pylua+Ec
◧◩◪◨
5. pylua+Ec[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-29 20:06:46
>>cuu508+1b
Anything? I tried to send money to someone but the button did not debounce the request and I ended up with more than one payment ?
replies(1): >>cuu508+Fi
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. cuu508+Fi[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-29 20:40:25
>>pylua+Ec
Ah, OK, so the end user is trying to prove there is a hard-to-reproduce fault in the software. I do not know how this is being handled in practice, but I think it would be reasonable to require evidence.
[go to top]