zlacker

YouTube had made way more content creators wealthy than the NYT. Writers are not going to be paid more after this ruling either way.

>>graphe+(OP)
Has the NYT made even a single content creator wealthy? Journalists there make less money than an average software engineer.

>>Jensso+f6
It's in the realm of possibility, lots of people found work post vox and buzzfeed too but i wouldn't classify it as the work of the NYT. "Real" creatives and content creators seem to embrace AI or at least grudgingly alter their own works, the OP I'm replying to would be cheering YouTube for suing openAI on the behalf of YouTubers everywhere, despite it having no bearing on reality.

The main objectors are the old guard monopolies that are threatened.

>>graphe+(OP)
Gadzooks! You're right! If only NYT had realised the secret to success was spewing out articles reacting to other articles reacting to other articles, they would all have been millionaires!

>>OOPMan+Uv
Did you forget the /s or do you not think that a lot of journalism is indeed reacting to other journalists?

>>graphe+e8
Have you been a creator on YT? Do you know how much an average creator gets paid? Did you know that it and other modern platforms like Spotify artificially skew payouts towards the richest brands? If not, then please let’s not make any claims about wealthiness and “old guard” monopolies here.