zlacker

>It’s only fair for the copyright owners to want a share of the pie.

No it's not, it's pure greed. Everyone'd think it absurd if copyright holders dared to demand that any human who reads their publicly available text has to pay them a fee, but just because OpenAI are training a brain made of silicon instead of a brain made of carbon all the rent-seekers come out to try to take advantage.

>>logicc+(OP)
You know the NYT has to fork out money to build the content right ?

>>bamboo+9x
Do you really think they're losing subscribers to ChatGPT...? Is there a single real person that thinks, "Oh, I don't need to pay the NYT anymore, I can just wait for the next OpenAI update six months from now and it'll summarize all the news for me"?

>>solard+TA
It's beside the point, the point is, money and time were spent producing that work, so why should OpenAI just be allowed to take it and profit from it, without at least attribution? It's absolutely ridiculous.

I saw an article the other day where they banned ByteDance's account for using their product to build their own, can you see the absolutely massive hypocrisy here?

It's fine for OpenAI to steal work, but if someone wants to steal theirs, it's not? I cannot believe people even try defend this shit. It's wack.

>>logicc+(OP)
> No it's not, it's pure greed.

And Altman (Mr. Worldcoin) and fucking Microsoft are what, some gracious angels building chatbots for the betterment of humanity? How is them stealing as much content as they can get away with not greedy, exactly?