zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jprete+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-27 15:26:27
The exact words used to explain the scientific law are copyrighted by the writer (presumably the paper's authors). Rephrasings are not copywrited by the source, but by the rephrasing entity (e.g. the NYT, or a teacher that made a handout for their class).

Copyright on scientific papers is most definitely a thing, by the way.

replies(1): >>rand12+D2
◧
2. rand12+D2[view] [source] 2023-12-27 15:39:28
>>jprete+(OP)
If the bar for copyright is as low as ordering of words, then I don't even know what to say.
replies(1): >>passwo+hr
◧◩
3. passwo+hr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-27 17:58:00
>>rand12+D2
So stop saying anything. Go learn how copyright works in the real world
replies(1): >>rand12+Gr
◧◩◪
4. rand12+Gr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-27 18:00:51
>>passwo+hr
What makes you think my opinions will change based on how legacy systems work in real world? Just because a stupid system exists doesn't mean it's correct.
[go to top]