zlacker

> Even if they win against openAI, how would this prevent something like a Chinese or Russian LLM from “stealing” their content and making their own superior LLM that isnt weakened by regulation like the ones in the United States.

Foreign companies can be barred from selling infringing products in the United States.

Russian and Chinese consumers are less interested in English-language articles.

I can’t really get behind the argument that we need to let LLM companies use any material they want because other countries (with other languages, no less) might not have the same restrictions.

If you want some examples of LLMs held back by regulations, look into some of the examinations of how Chinese LLMs are clearly trained to avoid answering certain topics that their government deems sensitive.

>>Aurorn+(OP)
>Chinese LLMs are clearly trained to avoid answering certain topics that their government deems sensitive

But they're not; you can download open source Chinese base models like Yi and Deepseek and ask them about Tianmen Square yourself and see, they don't have any special filtering.

>>logicc+x
I suspect they will crack down on that within the next few years.

>>Aurorn+(OP)
> Russian and Chinese consumers are less interested in English-language articles.

Isn't it just one additional step to automatically translate them?