zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. mbruml+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-12-27 14:45:29
Except Gmail does not own the copyrights to the email. So in the context to this article and theme of the post, the owner of the data is king. I don’t think any court would rule Google owned a novel sent over Gmail, little alone the contents of more normative emails.
replies(2): >>steveo+K8 >>jjtheb+ly
2. steveo+K8[view] [source] 2023-12-27 15:33:30
>>mbruml+(OP)
X might have a long-term edge if courts start ruling in favor of lawsuits like these? Being able to legally train on all Twitter data…
3. jjtheb+ly[view] [source] 2023-12-27 17:56:10
>>mbruml+(OP)
from the Google Terms of Service ( https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en-US ), makes me wonder who owns what, since users of Gmail agree to it.

"We also collect the content you create, upload, or receive from others when using our services. This includes things like email you write and receive, photos and videos you save, docs and spreadsheets you create, and comments you make on YouTube videos."

replies(1): >>mbruml+dl1
◧◩
4. mbruml+dl1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-27 22:25:50
>>jjtheb+ly
Collect does not mean own.
replies(1): >>jjtheb+Zc7
◧◩◪
5. jjtheb+Zc7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-12-29 20:58:23
>>mbruml+dl1
Right. I bet it means "use for language models", though.
[go to top]