zlacker

DALL-E 3 doesn't have Stable Diffusion's killer feature, which is the ability to use an image as input and influence that image with the prompt.

(DALL-E pretends to do that, but it's actually just using GPT-4 Vision to create a description of the image and then prompting based on that.)

Live editing tools like https://drawfast.tldraw.com/ are increasingly being built on top of Stable Diffusion, and are far and away the most interesting way to interact with image generation models. You can't build that on DALL-E 3.

>>simonw+(OP)
Saying SD is losing or not useful isn't my position.

But it clearly didn't win in many scenarios, especially those require text to be precise, and that happens to be more important in commercial setting, to clear up those gibberish texts generated by OSS stable diffusion seems tiring by itself.

>>karmas+L9
If you’re in charge of graphics in a “commercial setting”, you 100% couldn’t care less about text and likely do not want txt2img to include text at all. #1 it’s about the easiest thing to deal with in Photoshop, #2 you likely want to have complete control over text placement/fonts etc., #3 you actually have to have licenses for fonts, especially for commercial purposes. Using a random font from a txt2img generator can open you up to IP litigation.