zlacker

River to the Sea has clear meaning regarding the establishment of palestine and the eradication of israel.

You can draw a very neat line between the number of jews currently permitted to live peacefully in palestine vs the number of muslims living within israel.

its not complicated, confusing, unclear or opaque.

River to the Sea means to end the israeli state, and the end of that does not have a happy ending for any jews living on that land.

>>dijit+(OP)
I understand the claim about that interpretation. Repeating it doesn't help; we got it. If you know of evidence that that's the understanding among Palestinians, that would be great.

>>dijit+(OP)
Jews, Muslims and Christians have lived in that region relatively peacefully for a long time.

The end of Israel as an exclusionary apartheid state does not have to mean the end of Jews living there, in a pluralist state guaranteeing equal access to Christians, Jews and Muslims to their holy sites and shared ancestral homeland.

>>gr48th+P7
> a pluralist state guaranteeing equal access to Christians, Jews and Muslims to their holy sites and shared ancestral homeland.

How do you see implementing that politically? What constituency is there?