zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. qwytw+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-27 11:59:38
How is that better? With buybacks if I want to reinvest I don't have to pay taxes on them and if I want to realize the gains I can decide when to do that myself (of course seem more like an issue in Europe and with companies which only payout yearly).
replies(1): >>disgru+El
2. disgru+El[view] [source] 2023-11-27 14:29:59
>>qwytw+(OP)
Because it encourages longer-term ownership, and gives shareholders a stake in the future cash flows of the business.

Like I said, it's the tax treatment that basically stopped growth companies giving dividends. I think that we should change said tax treatment and also make buybacks illegal but that's a bit more controversial.

In any case, for both G and FB, they'd need to do buybacks anyway because of their employee share programs.

replies(1): >>konsch+iT1
◧◩
3. konsch+iT1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-27 21:24:05
>>disgru+El
Buybacks have the same effect of encouraging long-term ownership.

Given a certain amount of money, spending it on stock buybacks vs spending it on dividends returns the same amount of money to each HOLDING shareholder.

In one case, they receive a small sum. In the other case, the value of their stock goes up.

[go to top]