zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. jona-f+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-27 08:17:36
Opening the door wastes energy. And it seems, mindlessly going to the fridge to see what's inside even though you know exactly whats inside, is a thing many people are doing. So there is an argument to be made, that a camera in the fridge is a useful feature. I'm happy without it.
replies(2): >>aydyn+K5 >>PeterS+qe
2. aydyn+K5[view] [source] 2023-11-27 08:55:32
>>jona-f+(OP)
You could get a glass door fridge?
replies(1): >>yjftsj+z7
◧◩
3. yjftsj+z7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-27 09:09:29
>>aydyn+K5
That probably wastes more electricity; heat insulators and clear substances don't overlap very much.
replies(1): >>aydyn+9U1
4. PeterS+qe[view] [source] 2023-11-27 09:57:22
>>jona-f+(OP)
If the budget for the cameras, screens and apps would be spend on extra isolation, the fridge would overall be more ecological. But hey. I understand. Gadgets sell more than quality.
replies(1): >>chongl+Vm
◧◩
5. chongl+Vm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-27 11:13:47
>>PeterS+qe
If you want a fridge that’s really efficient, you can’t beat a chest/bunker freezer with a thermostat. Refrigerators lose all their efficiency from the vertically mounted doors which allow all the cold air to fall out instantly when you open the door. A chest freezer door is mounted horizontally so the cold air stays trapped inside, even when you open the door. This makes all the difference in the world!
◧◩◪
6. aydyn+9U1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-27 19:17:14
>>yjftsj+z7
Is that more heat waste than the habit of constantly closing and opening the door to check what's inside?
replies(1): >>yjftsj+Os2
◧◩◪◨
7. yjftsj+Os2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-27 21:57:23
>>aydyn+9U1
I don't have the ability to experimentally verify, but I would think so? A window is going to be there 24/7 and air doesn't actually have that high of a specific heat, so you'd really have to be constantly opening the door for it to come out in favor in my understanding.
[go to top]